Turkey Erdogan: Women rise up over withdrawal from Istanbul Convention *
The title draws attention to the aftermath of the withdrawal rather than its reason. It suggests that the reader might get more than just a reason.
Why did Turkey withdraw from the Istanbul Convention? *
The title is straight to the point. The reader should expect to know the answer after reading.
It has been a tumultuous and anxious week for women in Turkey. When President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a decree at midnight last Friday, annulling Turkey's ratification of the Istanbul Convention on violence against women, women poured on to the streets of Turkish cities to protest. Further demonstrations are planned. The convention is a legally-binding Council of Europe treaty, covering domestic violence and seeking to end legal impunity for perpetrators. It covers 34 European countries and took effect in 2014.
Among the protesters' slogans were "Istanbul Convention saves lives" and "We don't accept one man's decision".
Women's rights activists, lawyers and opposition politicians have denounced Mr Erdogan's decree, insisting he cannot legally take Turkey out of an international convention ratified by parliament.
Women are killed in Turkey every day and critics argue that this move puts women in even greater danger.
According to Turkey's We Will Stop Femicide Platform, at least 300 women were murdered in 2020, mostly by their partners, and 171 more women were found dead under suspicious circumstances. Turkey was the first state to ratify the convention, by a unanimous vote in the parliament in 2012, and it was actively supported by the Women and Democracy Association (Kadem), whose vice-chair is President Erdogan's daughter. He even praised the convention at one point as evidence that Turkey was a leader in gender equality.

Why scrap it?
However, Mr Erdogan has recently become more vulnerable politically. He has bowed to the demands of hardliners, both within his conservative AK party and in the Islamist opposition Felicity Party, in return for their support.
Opponents of the convention have complained it encourages divorce and undermines traditional family values. They find it especially problematic that signatories have to protect victims from discrimination regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Their worry is that this single clause may lead to gay marriage.
President Erdogan's spokesperson, Fahrettin Altun, argued that the Istanbul Convention's original intention of promoting women's rights had been "hijacked by a group of people attempting to normalise homosexuality" and that it was incompatible with Turkey's social and family values.
The Islamist-rooted AK party has increasingly voiced anti-LGBT+ sentiments. Most prominent so far has been a tweet from Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu calling LGBT+ individuals "perverted" - a comment that prompted a Twitter warning flag.To quell the critics, senior AKP members announced they would deal with domestic violence through judicial reform and an Ankara Convention that would claim its power from "traditions and customs".
In response women in pro-government circles and elsewhere have taken to social media to criticised the reference to "customs and traditions", which in their view designates women as second-class citizens.
For many women the scrapping of the convention is a huge disappointment. They were expecting the judiciary and police to be instrumental in cracking down on violence against women and LGBT+ people.
With or without the convention they want the judiciary to shed its reluctance to prosecute crimes against women, and impose adequate punishment as a deterrent.There have been mixed messages from the Kadem women's association, which has praised the convention as an "important initiative against domestic violence", but concluded that the decision to scrap it was a result of "societal tension" caused by it.

More pro-Erdogan moves
It is not just women who have been affected by midnight presidential decrees in recent days. Mr Erdogan also sacked Central Bank Governor Naci Agbal, who had won praise in the markets for aggressively raising the main interest rate to 19% to combat inflation.The president has replaced him with Sahap Kavcioglu, a man whose ideas on low interest rates are more in tune with his own. The change further weakened the Turkish lira. When asked to comment, a senior member of the president's team said "since it is Erdogan's decision, only he has the rationale".
Whatever the rationale may be, there is a sense that the man who has dominated Turkey since 2003 is seeking to consolidate his conservative support base as opinion polls signal discontent among voters.
State prosecutors in Turkey are also moving to ban the country's third-largest party, the Kurdish-rooted Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP). Their move is seen as emanating from the demands of the far-right Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), an ally of the president's AKP.Hardliners do appear to have gained more influence in the AKP, as it seeks to energise its core with party congresses ahead of 2023 elections.
In an era marked by coronavirus, unemployment and economic fragility, all these moves seem to be related. But as he seeks to shore up his position Mr Erdogan is also taking a risk.

The author is referring to the women and the LGBT community as "them, their view, they..."
Although author is a Turkish female, she is distancing herself from those people she is referring to.
The author is giving information on what is going to be done now that Turkey has withdrew from the convention.
Possible Meaning:
Opposition is against homosexuality and LGBT. A new convention might be anti-LGBT, if it takes its powers from traditions and customs.
Significance?
It draws attention to the unusuality of the event.
Usually governments don't issue decrees at midnight.
This is not directly related to "why Turkey withdrew from the convention".
It is the answer of another question: "why is this a bad decision".
Therefore it reveals Author's Bias

Additional Information:
-The author is a Turkish female journalist. This could effect how she looks at the withdrawal decision, therefore also effecting perspective she uses for this article.
-For verification of the femicides in Turkey, you can visit http://anitsayac.com
*A digital monument /femicide counter for women who die from violence in Turkey.
The author is pointing out Erdogan's contradicting views on the subject.
This is not necessary information, it reflects author's bias.
Author's bias + Cultural Bias & 1st objection

This sentence shows author's bias. She does not explain this claim further. This also reflects a cultural bias. A foreigner to the topic and to Turkey's political developments might not think of this as a reason.
Derivable Meaning:
Erdogan's support is decreasing and he needs new supporters.
Author's Bias

Word choice: scrap
The author could have chosen another word for the action such as withdraw, exit, cancel and so on. In fact one might argue those words would be more appropriate when talking about an agreement, aconvention.

given synonyms for "scrap"(by Merriam-Webster):
DISCARD, CAST, SHED,JUNK mean to get rid of.

This word choice reflects author's interpretation of the action by the President.
The author first introduces the objection and then points out how this objection is being tied to the convention.
The author is not with the opponents, she is quoting on others.It is a problem that convention protects everybody regardless of their sexual/gender orientation.
Author's bias + Religious Bias

The author connects the opposition ideas against the convention to religious conservative ideas and points out the unprofessional language the politicians use.
Author steers the conversation to the governments conservative views and reveals a hidden side of the withdrawal.
Derivable meaning:
From this, I understand that the convention guarantees victim protection equally to everybody who needs it. The way the author wrote this reveals the absurdity of the situation.
Why is it problematic to treat everybody equal?

Derivable meaning:
Author's Bias
-Author qualifies this withdrawal as a pro Erdogan move.

- Author thinks Erdogan has been in control of Turkey since 2003

- Author thinks this move was done to gain support

-Author might think as Erdogan did this to gain support, he might also lose support, taking a risk.

Derivable meaning:
Author's Bias
Author is reminding us her first reasoning of Erdogan needing supporters.

It sounds like the author wants to say that the President of Turkey has issued an illegal decree but she is being cautious. Rather than stating her own opinion she quotes others.
This sentence is a summary of what the convention does. The author gives her readers some background information. This might be useful for people who are not aware of the convention.
Used link
1)
http://anitsayac.com : Digital Femicide Counter for Turkey

CONCLUSION

The author uses a formal language, doesn't take sides with her writings. But when inspected carefully, I think she doesn't support the withdrawal. Her bias lies with the women. When talking about Erdogan she is hesitant, she uses other people's quotes and instead of reassuring verbs she uses "seem to be, is seen as, there is a sense that . .."

SO WHY DID TURKEY LEAVE THE CONVENTION
THE AUTHOR:
Well, pro-Erdogan politicians would say because it encourages divorce and doesn't respect Turkish traditions and customs, although I don't know what this means because I am also in the view that this is somewhat making women second class compared to men. In reality it is a political play for Erdogan to make his conservative supporters happy and increase votes for his party.
Back to Home Page
[ The Istanbul Convention was opened for signature at the meeting of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe held in Istanbul on May 11, 2011. Then Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu signed the convention on behalf of the Republic of Turkey, however, a decade later Turkey pulled out of the convention. ]
What is the reason behind Turkey's recent decision? We can narrow it down to three main objections.
First of all, femicide in Turkey, has doubled since the Istanbul Convention was signed and the relevant law came into effect. According to the World Bank data, the rate of femicide per 100,000 women is 0.9%. Although we are in the same category as Germany, and better than some EU countries such as Austria (1%) or Belgium (1.4%), the situation in Turkey is the opposite of the desired result the country had when signing.
Moreover, the contract caused a problematic loophole as it enables men (usually the husband) to be removed from his home and detached from his children for a period of a minimum of three months and a maximum of up to a year. A great number of men were suspended from their homes without any evidence.
[ Hence, there were certain malfeasances. For instance, two sisters who lost their money due to fraud and feared their father's reaction accused their father of abusing them and he was consequently imprisoned in accordance with the convention. Even though they admitted that they had slandered their father during the court process, the family was irreversibly damaged. ]
Unfortunately, there are hundreds of such examples that appeared in the Turkish media.
In addition, some of the articles of the convention are written in a feminist-queer lexicon, which would lead to irreconcilable differences with the Turkish family institution. Those articles would also have exposed students to LGBT discourses under the name of "gender equality" in classes. As the Polish justice minister said, “We are asked to educate young people that gender is something people can choose as they please. The LGBT community is trying to impose their own gender understanding through the Istanbul Convention. We cannot accept this.”
Thus, Turkey withdrew from the agreement due to its objections just like other states namely; Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia. Turkey decided to side with other members of the Council of Europe that did not sign the convention, such as; the U.K., Russia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Moldova, Liechtenstein and Armenia.
Somehow, U.S. President Joe Biden only criticized Turkey for its withdrawal, calling the decision "disappointing." What’s “disappointing” is the Biden administration's inability to protect female citizens keeping in mind that the U.S. femicide rate is 2.5 times higher than in Turkey.
It is important to remember that before the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government there were only eight women's shelters across Turkey. [ The party increased this number to 145 nationwide. Today, there are centers in every province where women who are victims of violence can receive free psychological and legal support with their children. Besides, the Interior Ministry launched an application called KADES, which notifies the police of the location of women who think they may be exposed to violence for immediate intervention. Since the Electronic Monitoring Center was established two years ago, the whereabouts of the men who were ordered to be suspended are monitored 24/7 by the state. ]
As you can see, Turkish women are not left unprotected just because Turkey decided to pull out of the Istanbul Convention. Even if Turkey chose to stay, it would not have meant an end to femicides as they are unfortunately happening all over the world. Our struggle will continue to force the AK Party government to do better within the framework of our laws. However, we should refrain from attention-seeking writers like Elif Şafak, or Shafak, who falsely claim that more than three women are murdered in Turkey every day.
The author gives background information about the convention. It is a formal information but is not very insightful about the convention itself.
Additional Insight:
Women are not protected in Turkey for most of the time. There have been many cases of women who wen't to the police and stated that their ex-husband/boyfriend is a threat to her. Unfortunately often later we hear them being killed by that person.

fact: In 22 March a woman was killed in Turkey by her ex husband who had a restraining order.
The author is giving examples of other countries that also have similar opinions. Is the author seeking to convey reaffirmation?

Additional Information:
The government the author quotes from has recently tried to ban
abortion. They can't be considered being for women rights. This might reveal author's bias.
Contradiction
"Somehow" is an interesting word choice. Was the author waiting for a bigger reaction from Biden? The author thinks the convention isn't working to begin with, so why is the author surprised at Biden's reaction?
The author is not talking about the lives Istanbul convention saves but rather, how it was misused.
This reveals author's bias.
Turkey is better than the U.S protecting their female citizens? This shows author's frustration &  bias.
Author's bias.
Why is this important to remember? This is not related to any reason of the withdrawal from the convention.
The author is promoting the government.
Reflects author's bias.
Sounds like a conclusion but not related to the main question.
Reflects author's bias.
How is this relevant? Who are these writers? Is their claim true? (Author does not think so)

Additional Insight
I wanted to check whether Elif Shafak's claim was true. According to the digital femicide counter  in 2020, 1 at least a woman was killed daily due to domestic violence.
Author's bias.
This word choice reflects author's bias. The author doesn't believe LGBT discourses are related to gender equality discourses and that students shouldn't be exposed to these.
1st Objection - Possible meanings
1) Istanbul Convention had no effect on protecting women.
2) Istanbul Convention is to blame for doubled femicide rates.[ As an outsider reader I am not sure what the convention is about.]
2nd Objection - Possible meaning
Istanbul Convention leaves men vulnerable.
The author doesn't give any information on whether guilty or innocent men were removed from their homes.
3rd Objection - Possible Meaning
The convention has a language that supports the equality of women and men and recognizes that there are other sexual orientations else than heterosexuality but the Turkish family institution does not support these ideas.
Author's Bias
The author is pointing out a statistical fact but actually this fact has nothing to do with the withdrawal from the convention if the assumption is not that femicide in Turkey decreased.(author stated that is not the case)
The author wants to convey its reader that Turkey is doing better than some EU countries.

-"Turkey got the opposite of the desired result when signing the convention."
Does this mean the convention is to blame? Author is not giving enough information about the convention and speaking in an ambiguous manner.
Used link
1)
http://anitsayac.com : Digital Femicide Counter for Turkey

Additional Insight: The author is known for her pro-government ideas and writings in Turkey.

CONCLUSION

The authors ideas are aligned with the Turkish government. She uses verbs that convey certainty (is, claims, are). She explains why Turkey withdraws from the convention in her opinion but also gives explanations of why this is not a bad idea. This isn't necessary for the question asked, it reflects the author's bias.

SO WHY DID TURKEY LEAVE THE CONVENTION
THE AUTHOR:
Because Istanbul Convention didn't help at all for femicide rates to go down and we have better statistics thane some EU countries. Moreover instead of protecting women it puts men at risk. Also it risks our traditional values because it teaches equality for women and men and teaches that there are other sexual/gender orientations else than what is accepted by our society and traditions. Also I will not end here but keep writing about what other good stuff the AK Party government did for women and also tell you what you shouldn't read.

Back to Home Page